Duncan's Cruxial Experiment

Messages in thread: 6.

		Duncan's Cruxial Experiment - 1/16/2002 - by Duncan None.
		[Originally XML-RPCed from Radio to Duncan's Cruxial Experiment (see also Duncan's Reply

		Re: Duncan's Cruxial Experiment - 1/16/2002 - by Seth Dillingham None.
		You may be pleased to find that today we're releasing Conversant's support for the Reply

		RE: Duncan's Cruxial Experiment - 1/16/2002 - by Duncan Smeed None.
		> >You may be pleased to find that today we're releasing Conversant's support >for Reply

		RE: Duncan's Cruxial Experiment - 1/16/2002 - by Seth Dillingham None.
		On 1/16/2002 at 10:24 AM, Duncan Smeed wrote: >>You may be pleased to find Reply

		RE: Duncan's Cruxial Experiment - 1/16/2002 - by Seth Dillingham None.
		On 1/16/2002 at 10:34 AM, Seth Dillingham wrote: >>Pleased!? Pleased!!? All Reply

		RE: Duncan's Cruxial Experiment - 1/16/2002 - by Duncan Smeed None.
		At 10:34 AM -0500 16/1/02, Seth Dillingham wrote: > >Pleased!? Pleased!!? All my Reply