Msg#2688 - RE: The case for Conversant
In response to: 2686 | <<Back | Next>> | Top of Thread | View Full Thread | Reply | Edit
Posted: 5/27/2002 by Duncan Smeed Modified: 5/27/2002 by Duncan Smeed
>Good points, and I'll stop hogging Duncan's discussion group with >Conversant debates. Don't worry about that Mark. Happy to host the discussion but it's probably of interest to a wider Conversant audience. Duncan
Enclosures: None.
Replies: None.
![[Duncan's Home]](http://media.smeed.org/images/cartoon.gif)
