[Duncan's Home] Duncan's Jotter
faq -  feedback -  home 
Members
Logon   -   Sign Up

RE: The case for Conversant

Msg#2684 - RE: The case for Conversant

In response to: 2646 | <<Back | Next>> | Top of Thread | View Full Thread | Reply | Edit

Posted: 5/27/2002 by Mark Morgan
Modified: 5/27/2002 by Mark Morgan

"I can't think of anything that Manila provides that isn't in Conversant."

  1. Local backup
  2. Static rendering
  3. A permission level between member and administrator

Only the third matters to me, but you asked. You know I still love Conversant, right, Seth?

Enclosures:
None.

Replies:
RE: The case for Conversant ( 5/27/2002 by Seth Dillingham, Label: None. )
On 5/27/02, Mark Morgan said: >Local backup Not true. Free-Conversant

Tell ICANN to keep their hands off .org!


Run the HTML validator for this page
Webmaster: web at smeed.org